Radiometric dating idiots google voice widget not updating
Carbon-14 is but one of several radiometric dating methods that evolutionists consult when they build consensus on the age of particular fossils and (again by consensus, not by testable-repeatable science) decide how to arrange what they think our ancient history must have been.
They believe that with enough time and chance - just maybe some unscientific reactions may beat the odds and "improve all by themselves." God can then be ignored and evolutionists can claim to be logical and forward thinking in their ignorance of what's most important in this life.
Additional tests were done on six grain samples from the destruction level resulting in dates between 16 B. and 12 charcoal samples from the destruction level resulting in dates between 16 B. The literature on the subject is enormous, so I will not attempt to give you references.
There is a heated debate going on among scholars concerning this, especially with regard to the date of the eruption of Thera (Santorini).
Parts of each measurement are based in known solid science, but there are assumed portions! zircons form, they chemically attract uranium atoms and chemically reject lead atoms ...